[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7451: Better name for $(AM_V_at)?
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
bug#7451: Better name for $(AM_V_at)? |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:43:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) |
From the automake manual, section on the "silent-rules" option:
``You can use the predefined variable $(AM_V_GEN) as a prefix to
commands that should output a status line in silent mode, and
$(AM_V_at) as a prefix to commands that should not output
anything in silent mode. When output is to be verbose, both
of these variables will expand to the empty string.''
Could we find a better name than $(AM_V_at)?
- $(AM_V_SILENT) is nice, but also a bit too long. I wouldn't mind,
but some people dislike long names for often-used variables.
- $(SILENT) is shorter, but too much invasive of the user namespace.
I'd strongly advise against it.
- Other suggestions?
If we find such a better name, we should then deprecate $(AM_V_at),
but *not* remove it: it should be kept for backward-compatibility
(probably for quite a long time).
See also this older thread
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2010-04/msg00001.html>
Regards,
Stefano
- bug#7451: Better name for $(AM_V_at)?,
Stefano Lattarini <=