[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: different behaviour of bash and sh
From: |
Earnie Boyd |
Subject: |
Re: different behaviour of bash and sh |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Mar 2001 07:42:27 -0500 |
In the Cygwin release
sh != bash
sh == ash
Earnie.
Ralf Fassel wrote:
>
> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
> Machine: i686
> OS: cygwin
> Compiler: gcc
> Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash.exe' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i686'
> -DCONF_OSTYPE='cygwin' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='i686-pc-cygwin' -DCONF_VENDOR='pc'
> -DSHELL -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../src -I../src/include -I../src/lib
> -I/src/bash/distro/usr/include -g -O2
> uname output: CYGWIN_NT-4.0 MARS 1.1.8(0.34/3/2) 2001-01-31 10:08 i686 unknown
> Machine Type: i686-pc-cygwin
>
> Bash Version: 2.04
> Patch Level: 7
> Release Status: release
>
> Description:
> The following script behaves differently in bash and sh:
>
> % cat script
> #!/bin/sh --
> checkstat() {
> echo $?
> }
> false
> checkstat
> # End of file
>
> Repeat-By:
>
> $ type bash
> bash is /usr/bin/bash
> $ bash script
> 1
> $ type sh
> sh is /usr/bin/sh
> $ sh script
> 0
>
> The 0 is wrong IMHO, it should be 1. (Even HP with their BD-/bin/sh
> returns 1).
>
> R'
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com