bug-bash
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[jobs doesnt report status correctly on kill -CONT


From: J.Smith
Subject: [jobs doesnt report status correctly on kill -CONT
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 20:52:12 +0200

Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
Machine: i586
OS: linux-gnu
Compiler: gcc
Compilation
CFLAGS:  -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='i586' -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -
DCONF_MACHTYPE='i586-mandrake-linux-gnu' -DCONF_VENDOR='mandrake' -DSHELL -D
HAVE_CONFIG_H  -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64  -I. -I/usr/include -I. -I./include -I
./lib -I/usr/include -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -s -march=pentium -ffast
-math -fexpensive-optimizations
uname output: Linux myhome.home.net 2.2.17-21mdk #1 Thu Oct 5 13:16:08 CEST
2000 i686 unknown
Machine Type: i586-mandrake-linux-gnu

Bash Version: 2.04
Patch Level: 12
Release Status: release

Description:
There seems to be a problem with the 'jobs' command. It doesnt report the
status of a job correctly when you send a background job a SIGSTOP signal,
followed by a SIGCONT signal using the kill command. If I start a job in the
background, using the '&' at the end, and then issue a kill -STOP followed
by a kill -CONT, 'jobs' *still* reports the job as being stopped, even
though in reality it is actually running again.

As a side-effect, this also makes the builtin 'wait' misbehave, when you try
to wait on a really 'running' job that 'jobs' reports as 'stopped'.


Repeat-By:

First, we start a job in the background.

# ls -alR >/dev/null 2>&1 &

Then we stop it by sending a SIGSTOP signal using the 'kill' command

# kill -STOP PID-of-ls

Now when we execute the builtin 'jobs',

#jobs

jobs correctly reports the job as 'stopped'

Next, we resume the job sending it a SIGCONT signal using the 'kill' command

# kill -CONT PID-of-ls

Now when we execute the builtin 'jobs',

# jobs

jobs incorrectly still reports the job as being 'stopped', even though in
reality it is actually running again, as we can prove by running 'ps'.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]