[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: maybe some of these "case" reactions are no-no's

From: Paul Jarc
Subject: Re: maybe some of these "case" reactions are no-no's
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 20:12:20 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/20.7 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu)

Dan Jacobson <address@hidden> wrote:
> In the manual is says
>   case word in [ [(] pattern [ | pattern ] ... ) list ;; ]
>        ... esac
> $ case esac 
>> #odd, why is it asking for another line instead of failing?

"esac" is a word.  There is no error yet.  "in" is expected next.
man bash:
       The following words are recognized as reserved when unquoted
       and either the first word of a simple comĀ­ mand (see SHELL
       GRAMMAR below) or the third word of a case or for command:
       [...] esac
In this context, "esac" is not considered a reserved word.

> $ case a in b);;esac

No problem with this code, AFAIK, so this would be a documentation

> $ case a in b)esac #odd.  what about ;;?

Looks like that ought to fail.

> $ case a in b);esac
> bash: syntax error near unexpected token `;e'

Correct failure, bad error message.  Something like this has been
discussed here already.

> $ case a in b): esac
> $ case a in b)date esac

You've given a command with an argument of "esac".  ";;" or another
command is expected next.

> $ case a in b)date ;esac
> $ case b in b)date ;esac
> Tue 04  9 21:12:29 CST 2002

Looks like that ought to fail.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]