[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools...
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools... |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:02:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hello everybody,
* Linda W wrote on Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:16:44PM CET:
> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> >Note: As far as I can tell the echo tests in the configure script
> >generated by autoconf-2.59 tests for quite many things but not \digit as
> >far as I can tell. I have not yet looked into the CVS version.
Confirmed with
- bash-3.0 configured as
configure --enable_xpg_default
- squid CVS (as described by Paul), configured as
CONFIG_SHELL=xpgbash; export CONFIG_SHELL
$CONFIG_SHELL ../squid/configure -C --enable_xpg_default \
CONFIG_SHELL=$CONFIG_SHELL
- both the autotools versions used in the CVS version, as well as CVS
Autoconf.
The issue is not in Autoconf, but in the macro AC_CREATE_PREFIX_CONFIG_H
(taken from the autoconf archive?). Inside the squid source tree, the
macro resides in lib/cppunit-1.10.0/config/ac_create_prefix_config_h.m4
as part of the cppunit subpackage.
The macro is now deemed obsolete at
http://autoconf-archive.cryp.to/macros-by-category.html
the successor is AX_PREFIX_CONFIG_H. Which itself uses printf to work
around these issues. It has other issues with recent Autoconf, though,
so it needs changed as well. I will look into that, and post an update.
FWIW, are there _any_ other shells that do not output \1 with
echo "\\1"
except for bash-3.0-with-xpg-echo?
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., (continued)
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Paul Eggert, 2006/03/20
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Andreas Schwab, 2006/03/20
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Paul Eggert, 2006/03/20
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Andreas Schwab, 2006/03/20
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Paul Eggert, 2006/03/27
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Eric Blake, 2006/03/28
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Chet Ramey, 2006/03/20
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Henrik Nordstrom, 2006/03/23
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Paul Eggert, 2006/03/19
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Linda W, 2006/03/27
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools...,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/23
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/23
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Henrik Nordstrom, 2006/03/23
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Chet Ramey, 2006/03/31
- Re: echo "enhancement" leads to confused legacy script tools..., Andreas Schwab, 2006/03/23