Re: completion inconsistencies involving symlinks

[nu6ohq602]

> > I assume my original bug is still open, though?
>
> I thought I answered that.  If you prefer physical paths, use `set -o 
> physical' to force them.

I'm not sure I understand. Whether I want to use logical paths or not 
seems independent of whether or not the command I'm currently typing only 
respects physical paths. So if I don't want to set -o physical, ls 
completion like in my original mail should still be consistent, right? 
What am I missing?
  $ ls ..
  y
  $ ls ../<Tab>
  f  x

Thanks,
Kartik