[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does HIGH_FD_MAX have to be so low?
|
From: |
Chet Ramey |
|
Subject: |
Re: Does HIGH_FD_MAX have to be so low? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:02:36 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) |
Mike Stroyan wrote:
> move_to_high_fd() only avoid open file descriptors if the
> check_new parameter is non-zero. open_shell_script() calls
> move_to_high_fd() with a check_new value of 0. The other two callers
> of the function do pass in a check_new value of 1.
>
Aha! I missed the most relevant call. Now the question is whether or
not it's still a good idea to pass that 0 from open_shell_script.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Live Strong. No day but today.
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/