[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:53:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) |
Eric Blake wrote:
>> Anyhow I see that bash has taken the liberty of changing
>> the traditional acronym expansion from "Input Field Separator" to
>> "Internal Field Separator". A subtle difference.
>
> OK, you found a legitimate bug in the bash documentation. Perhaps Chet
> will change that for the next release.
I doubt it. IFS isn't an `input' field separator in the awk sense.
Bash is not alone in using the `Internal' adjective; the man pages for
the Bourne shell from v7 to SVR4.2, ksh, and zsh do so as well.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
Live Strong. No day but today.
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution, (continued)
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution, Chet Ramey, 2006/10/29
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution, bash, 2006/10/29
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution, Eric Blake, 2006/10/29
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution, bash, 2006/10/29
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution, bash, 2006/10/29
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution, bash, 2006/10/29
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution, Eric Blake, 2006/10/29
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution, bash, 2006/10/29
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution, Eric Blake, 2006/10/29
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution, bash, 2006/10/29
- Re: Spaces in args, escapes, and command substitution,
Chet Ramey <=