[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash for OS/2
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: Bash for OS/2 |
Date: |
Thu, 22 May 2008 23:04:53 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
On Thursday 22 May 2008, Brendan Oakley wrote:
> With some effort and help, I have Bash 3.1 built and mostly working
> under OS/2. This uses gcc 3.3.5 with "kLIBC" 0.6.3, rather than the
> old EMX tools. 3.2 needs a bit more work, and some of the patches
> might need some more polish. My questions:
>
> Are you interested in these patches?
>
> If so, would you prefer I submit them in bits, for each individual
> fix, or do you want to see the whole thing in one big patch?
>
> Will you accept them now even though the effort is not yet complete,
> or would you rather I had Bash 3.2 working 100% with perfect style
> before you want to see it?
posting patches would probably be useful to the next random person who wants
bash running on OS/2, but if you want to get included, writing proper patches
against the latest release+patchset is the way to go.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Bash for OS/2, Brendan Oakley, 2008/05/22
- Re: Bash for OS/2,
Mike Frysinger <=