[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: process substition and "source"

From: Chet Ramey
Subject: Re: process substition and "source"
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 08:26:53 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Macintosh/20080421)

Poor Yorick wrote:
In the following example, I expected the commands in the here-documents to be
interpreted in the current shell, but it seems they weren't.  Is it my
misunderstanding, a feature, or a bug?

They're not interpreted in the current shell; in versions of bash up to
and including bash-3.2, `.' doesn't work on anything but regular files.
This restriction has been lifted in bash-4.0.


``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer

Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    address@hidden    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]