[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: coprocess suggestions
|
From: |
Pierre Gaston |
|
Subject: |
Re: coprocess suggestions |
|
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:08:03 +0200 |
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Pierre Gaston <pgas@freeshell.org> wrote:
> I have a couple of suggestions about coprocesses.
> If I understood correctly how coproc works, I think that
> instead of :
> coproc [NAME] command [redirections]
>
> the documentation would be a little clearer with something like:
>
> coproc simple-command [redirections]
> coproc NAME compound-command [redirections]
>
hmm actually I just realized that it can also be:
coproc compound-command [redirections]
maybe then the manual could says something along the lines
"if a NAME is used the command must be a compound command"