[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: coprocess suggestions
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: coprocess suggestions |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:52:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) |
Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> writes:
> Pierre Gaston wrote:
>> I have a couple of suggestions about coprocesses.
>> If I understood correctly how coproc works, I think that
>> instead of :
>> coproc [NAME] command [redirections]
>>
>> the documentation would be a little clearer with something like:
>>
>> coproc simple-command [redirections]
>> coproc NAME compound-command [redirections]
>
> I agree. I will make it clearer that NAME cannot be used if the
> coproc command is a simple command, to avoid confusion with the
> first word of the command.
Even then the grammar is ambiguous. What looks like a NAME followed by
a compound-command can also be interpreted as a simple-command where
NAME is the first word of it.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."