[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode"
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode" |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:55:19 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 02:00:53PM +0000, Stephane CHAZELAS wrote:
> I can understand it. I was more curious about the origins. After
> all, that breaks Bourne backward compatibility (in a shell
> called Bourne-again shell)
Bourne shell has no functions at all.
> Has there be historical versions of sh that
> didn't support it?
Bourne shell on Ultrix and (I believe still to this day) Sun Solaris.
No functions at all. None.
- [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Stephane CHAZELAS, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Chet Ramey, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Stephane CHAZELAS, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Chet Ramey, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Stephane CHAZELAS, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode",
Greg Wooledge <=
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Chris F.A. Johnson, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Stephane CHAZELAS, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Chet Ramey, 2009/10/28
- Re: [OT] Re: how to start in "overwrite-mode", Marc Herbert, 2009/10/29