Re: [PATCH] silent job monitor when 'set +m'

[Jeff Chua]

On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:

>
> Are you saying you ran a script in which you enabled job
> control, ran a job, turned job control off, then killed the job?
>

No, I didn't turn off job control. I use "set +m" to turn of monitoring only
because I don't want to see any message about the job being terminated.


> Bash and historical versions of sh report the status of jobs in a script
> that exit as the result of being killed by a signal.  I'm not going to
> change that.
>

Isn't that the purpose of "set +m" ... to turn off monitoring?

Thanks,
Jeff