[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Error handling question
From: |
Sven Mascheck |
Subject: |
Re: Error handling question |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:07:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:43:43PM -0500, Chet Ramey wrote:
> > [...] confusing Solaris (quite recent SVR4-like shell)
> > with Ultrix (sh: V7-like shell without functions
> Solaris's default shell, though more modern than the old Ultrix one,
> is not Posix-conformant.
Gosh, my "recent" ('88) is certainly not related to POSIX.
If my remark was ambiguous, then thanks for avoiding even
more confusion! :-)
- Re: Error handling question, (continued)
- Re: Error handling question, Chet Ramey, 2009/11/09
- Message not available
- Re: Error handling question, Jan Schampera, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Greg Wooledge, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Greg Wooledge, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Sven Mascheck, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Chet Ramey, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question,
Sven Mascheck <=
- Re: Error handling question, Marc Herbert, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Marc Herbert, 2009/11/10
- Re: Error handling question, Marc Herbert, 2009/11/10
- Re: Error handling question, Chet Ramey, 2009/11/09
- Re: Error handling question, Marc Herbert, 2009/11/10
- Re: Error handling question, Chet Ramey, 2009/11/10