[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: qwerty
From: |
Ken Irving |
Subject: |
Re: qwerty |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:10:15 -0900 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:47:52AM +0100, Antonio Macchi wrote:
> $ printf "%s\n" ok -
> ok
> -
>
> why that score in the newline?
Your pattern has one format operator, but there are two arguments,
so the pattern is applied again.
> --------
>
> $ printf "%d %s\n" 1 ok -
> 1 ok
> -bash: printf: -: invalid number
> 0
>
> why getting error here, and not in the previous?
> why "invalid number" ?
> what is that zero?
Again, you have more arguments than operators, so it makes another pass,
and on the second pass tries to format - as a number... Don't know
about the zero, but I guess %d maybe starts with a default of 0...?
> --------
>
> $ printf "%2s\n" qwerty
> qwerty
>
> strings larger than fixed-width are entire written?
It's not fixed width but minimum width.
> I'm using BASH_VERSION 3.2.39, so please forgive me if this issue are
> already fixed
There's nothing to fix. It might help if you provide some markers
in your test patterns so you can see where each argument begins and
ends, e.g.,
$ printf "(%d) {%s}\n" 1 ok -
(1) {ok}
-bash: printf: -: invalid number
(0) {}
Ken
--
Ken Irving, fnkci@uaf.edu, 907-474-6152
Water and Environmental Research Center
Institute of Northern Engineering
University of Alaska, Fairbanks
- qwerty, Antonio Macchi, 2009/11/11
- Re: qwerty,
Ken Irving <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
Message not available