[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash source repository
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: Bash source repository |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:59:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Jan Schampera wrote:
> The official patches should be there as individual commits. Though, I
> admit it's not a small amount of work to do all that for the past
> releases. Such a GIT or SVN repository technically is easy to do, but
> who feeds it :(
Moving forward from now it should be reasonably easy to keep it up to
date with official patches. But recreating the history of all of the
past releases and all official patches for all past releases would be
significant effort. Just trying to locate all of them would be quite
the task.
If someone actually had all of the releases and all of the patches
together (the hard part) then I would be willing to put them together
(the easy part) for the version control history. But as you say, then
someone still needs to feed it when new official patches are released.
Bob
- Bash source repository, André Goddard Rosa, 2009/11/02
- Re: Bash source repository, Chet Ramey, 2009/11/02
- Re: Bash source repository, Mike Frysinger, 2009/11/02
- Re: Bash source repository, Chet Ramey, 2009/11/02
- Re: Bash source repository, Bob Proulx, 2009/11/02
- Re: Bash source repository, André Goddard Rosa, 2009/11/22
- Re: Bash source repository, Chet Ramey, 2009/11/22
- Message not available
- Re: Bash source repository, Jan Schampera, 2009/11/23
- Re: Bash source repository,
Bob Proulx <=
- Re: Bash source repository, Chet Ramey, 2009/11/23