[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IFS handling and read
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: IFS handling and read |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:15:06 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
Lhunath (Maarten B.) wrote:
> Note that 'read' is a bash feature; not a POSIX shell feature. In that
> sense, "read" alone is limiting your "portability". So portability in the
> meaning of POSIX is out of the question.
Pardon me? `read' is a feature of every historical shell and standardized
by Posix. The bash implementation is a superset of Posix.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- IFS handling and read, Юрий Пухальский, 2009/11/27
- IFS handling and read, Юрий Пухальский, 2009/11/26
- Re: IFS handling and read, Eric Blake, 2009/11/26
- Re: IFS handling and read, Marc Herbert, 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, Lhunath (Maarten B.), 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, Greg Wooledge, 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, Lhunath (Maarten B.), 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read,
Chet Ramey <=
- Re: IFS handling and read, Lhunath (Maarten B.), 2009/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: IFS handling and read, Jan Schampera, 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, Andreas Schwab, 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, Marc Herbert, 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, Lhunath (Maarten B.), 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, Marc Herbert, 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, Greg Wooledge, 2009/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: IFS handling and read, pk, 2009/11/30
- Re: IFS handling and read, pk, 2009/11/30