[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bash manual - interactive shell definition
From: |
Marc Herbert |
Subject: |
Re: Bash manual - interactive shell definition |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:16:05 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825) |
>> Could this sentence:
>>
>> "An interactive shell is one started without non-option arguments,
>> unless -sis specified, without specifying the
>> -c option, and whose input and error output are both connected to terminals
>> (as determined by isatty(3)), or one started with the -i option. "
>>
>> be any more confusing?
>
> Is seems pretty clearly stated to me.
Please enlighten us with the priority of English boolean operators.
I have never seen a natural language sentence with so many boolean operators.
- Bash manual - interactive shell definition, Robert Cratchit, 2010/03/11
- Re: Bash manual - interactive shell definition, Ken Irving, 2010/03/12
- Re: Bash manual - interactive shell definition,
Marc Herbert <=
- Re: Bash manual - interactive shell definition, Ken Irving, 2010/03/12
- Re: Bash manual - interactive shell definition, Ken Irving, 2010/03/12
- Re: Bash manual - interactive shell definition, Pierre Gaston, 2010/03/12
- Re: Bash manual - interactive shell definition, Ken Irving, 2010/03/12
- Re: Bash manual - interactive shell definition, Pierre Gaston, 2010/03/12
- Re: Bash manual - interactive shell definition, Pierre Gaston, 2010/03/12
Re: Bash manual - interactive shell definition, Chet Ramey, 2010/03/12