[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Source code repository

From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: Source code repository
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:12:22 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3

On 03/13/2010 11:48 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> OK.  The commit logs all read “Imported from TARBALL”, though, so I
> suppose there aren’t individual commits for the patches that can be seen
> at ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bash/bash-X.Y-patches, right?

That's my understanding as well, although individual commits per patch
would be nicer.

> Also, there’s no “Imported from ../bash-4.1.tar.gz” message even though
> 4.1 is the latest release.  So does the current HEAD correspond to 4.0?
>> (and could use some TLC in reflecting recent patches, or even being
>> modified to show patches in finer granularity).
> TLC?

Tender Loving Care, from someone who has push rights to that repository
(I don't, or I might have taken some time to do so already).

> Do you mean there exists a private repository with more detailed
> history?

Does it matter, if it isn't made public?

>> Unfortunately, Chet has expressed a desire to keep it that way for the
>> foreseeable future.
> I find it unfortunate, too, as it makes it very hard to follow
> developments.

You aren't the first with this complaint.

Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]