[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compiling BASH on windows without cygwin not possible
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: compiling BASH on windows without cygwin not possible |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:40:35 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1 |
On 3/26/10 11:59 PM, Jim Michaels wrote:
> bash 4.1
> XP Pro SP3 32-bit,
> using MinGW compiler
>
> short description:
> I have discovered that the installation method for BASH is actually recursive
> in nature, if I am not mistaken, requiring BASH to install BASH. read the
> first steps of the install.
>
> " 1. `cd' to the directory containing the source code and type
> `./configure' to configure Bash for your system. If you're using
> `csh' on an old version of System V, you might need to type `sh
> ./configure' instead to prevent `csh' from trying to execute
> `configure' itself."
>
> configure is a BASH script. Am I not correct in stating that BASH requires
> BASH to install?
Yes. There is no native windows bootstrap mechanism available in the
source distribution. You have to rely on something like MinGW, which has
an already-compiled shell available for download.
> windows does not come with any such sh shell. and I need to be able to build
> one from scratch.
>
> you are not doing me any favors here, and I need BASH. please fix.
Sorry, I don't do development on Windows. I leave that to the cygwin and
MinGW folks.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/