[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: asking for a better way to implement this
From: |
Christopher Roy Bratusek |
Subject: |
Re: asking for a better way to implement this |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:39:56 +0200 |
> It's a bad idea to alias rm. It would be better to use your xrm
> directly. If you alias rm and get in the habit of it protecting you,
> one of these days the alias won't be there and OOPS, gone!
Well... I know what you mean, but I'm using GNU/Linux for seven years now, it's
now
almost impossible to learn to use `xrm' instead of `rm'. Besides, it won't
disappear
somewhen, it's hardcoded (and bound to other stuff, which I know whether it
exists or
not).
- asking for a better way to implement this, Christopher Roy Bratusek, 2010/09/26
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Ken Irving, 2010/09/26
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Dennis Williamson, 2010/09/26
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this,
Christopher Roy Bratusek <=
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Greg Wooledge, 2010/09/27
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2010/09/27
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Christopher Roy Bratusek, 2010/09/27
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Andre Majorel, 2010/09/27
- Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Andreas Schwab, 2010/09/28
Re: asking for a better way to implement this, Andreas Schwab, 2010/09/26