[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bash: Correct usage of F_SETFD

From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: bash: Correct usage of F_SETFD
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:27:06 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.6

On 11/22/2010 03:16 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
>> include/filecntl.h in bash-4.1 has following:
>> #define SET_CLOSE_ON_EXEC(fd)  (fcntl ((fd), F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC))
>> Is that really the correct/intended usage of F_SETFD ?
>      F_SETFD            Set the close-on-exec flag associated with fildes to
>                         the low order bit of arg (0 or 1 as above).
>> If kernel ever adds a new flag to the fd, this would end up clearing the
>> other new flag right ?
>> Shouldn't bash use F_GETFD to get the current flags and set/clear just
>> the FD_CLOEXEC bit ?
> I suppose it would matter if there are systems that have more than one
> flag value.

In practice, there aren't any such systems; but POSIX warns that current
practice is no indicator of future systems, and that read-modify-write
is the only way to use F_SETFD.

Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]