|
From: | Dominic Raferd |
Subject: | Re: bash 'let' can give error |
Date: | Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:19:12 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 |
On 10/12/2010 15:15, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Thanks Greg (and also Eric and Andreas). Your FAQ makes it very clear; that is to say, it makes it clear how darned complicated it is. Seems best to avoid using 'set -e' altogether, as you say (except perhaps at an early stage for debugging): point taken.On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 05:52:49PM +0000, Dominic Raferd wrote:Why does this happen? Is it 'by design'? It makes arithmetic with bash let very dangerous because it can throw unexpected errors (and break scripts running with set -e).http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/105 -- Why doesn't set -e (set -o errexit) do what I expected?
Dominic
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |