|
From: | Roman Rakus |
Subject: | Re: for; do; done regression ? |
Date: | Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:05:04 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6 |
On 01/10/2011 05:24 PM, Marc Herbert wrote:
I will say the same on both lists - why to execute another process if you can do the same in the current one? No gain.Le 10/01/2011 13:38, Greg Wooledge a écrit :Don't use seq, ever, because it's Linux-only and is a stupid way to count when bash has builtin integer arithmetic.")seq is not exactly Linux-only but GNU-only. GNU-specific versus bash-specific, which is worse? I'd say it depends... on which mailing-list you post :-)
RR
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |