bug-bash
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: for; do; done regression ?


From: Roman Rakus
Subject: Re: for; do; done regression ?
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:05:04 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6

On 01/10/2011 05:24 PM, Marc Herbert wrote:
Le 10/01/2011 13:38, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
Don't use seq, ever, because it's Linux-only
and is a stupid way to count when bash has builtin integer arithmetic.")
seq is not exactly Linux-only but GNU-only.

GNU-specific versus bash-specific, which is worse? I'd say it
depends... on which mailing-list you post :-)





I will say the same on both lists - why to execute another process if you can do the same in the current one? No gain.

RR



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]