[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading
From: |
Maarten Billemont |
Subject: |
Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:32:13 +0100 |
On 23 Mar 2011, at 21:28, Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> OK. What wording would you like to see?
I don't mind the wording he proposed:
On 23 Mar 2011, at 17:12, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> maybe it should say
>
> BASH_SUBSHELL
> Incremented by one in each nested subshell or subshell
> evironment.
> It is always 0 when $BASH_PID=$$
>
>
- BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Sam Liddicott, 2011/03/23
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2011/03/23
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Sam Liddicott, 2011/03/23
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Marc Herbert, 2011/03/24
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Greg Wooledge, 2011/03/24
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Marc Herbert, 2011/03/24
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Greg Wooledge, 2011/03/24
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Clark J. Wang, 2011/03/24
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Maarten Billemont, 2011/03/23