[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading
From: |
Marc Herbert |
Subject: |
Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:07:33 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
Le 24/03/2011 14:50, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 02:33:19PM +0000, Marc Herbert wrote:
>> I would also like to see this example in the documentation:
>>
>> $ ( echo sub-$BASH_SUBSHELL ); echo main-$BASH_SUBSHELL
>> sub-1
>> main-0
>
> Overkill.
Tradeoff.
> Most of the other features in the manual do not have such
> examples, and if we added examples of this size for every single feature,
> the manual would swell up to a tremendous size. It's already quite large.
Not every feature is complicated enough that it requires special
documentation care and that it raises a discussion here.
- BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Sam Liddicott, 2011/03/23
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2011/03/23
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Sam Liddicott, 2011/03/23
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Marc Herbert, 2011/03/24
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Greg Wooledge, 2011/03/24
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading,
Marc Herbert <=
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Greg Wooledge, 2011/03/24
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Clark J. Wang, 2011/03/24
- Re: BASH_SUBSHELL documentation misleading, Maarten Billemont, 2011/03/23