[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eval
From: |
Rafael Fernandez |
Subject: |
Re: eval |
Date: |
Wed, 4 May 2011 15:40:01 -0500 |
I appreciate the links and information. I prematurely assumed it was a bug
as I am used to the behavior of sh on NetBSD which does not require
enclosing positional parameters. I believe it is adequately expressed in the
manual page, I just need to improve my reading comprehension. Thanks.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > For the future, the sh specification at
> > http://www.unix.org/2008edition/ (free registration required)
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
> (no registration required)
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
> GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
> "And now for something completely different."
>
--
PGP Key ID
0x1AE8B32A<http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBF2AE4D81AE8B32A>
- eval, Rafael Fernandez, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Jonathan Nieder, 2011/05/03
- Re: eval, DJ Mills, 2011/05/03
- Re: eval, Rafael Fernandez, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Jonathan Nieder, 2011/05/04
- Re: eval, Andreas Schwab, 2011/05/04
- Re: eval,
Rafael Fernandez <=
- Re: eval, Chet Ramey, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Eric Blake, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Chet Ramey, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Eric Blake, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Chet Ramey, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Sven Mascheck, 2011/05/05
- Re: eval, Chet Ramey, 2011/05/05
Re: eval, Greg Wooledge, 2011/05/04