Re: bug in force_interactive handling

[Chet Ramey]

On 1/4/12 7:20 AM, Stas Sergeev wrote:

> Hello Chet, I double-checked that, and with the attached
> quick hack I was able to do:
> trap bg USR1
> and move the job to the background with just that SIGUSR1.
> Do you think such a feature is worth being implemented?

I don't think there's enough need to change bg from operating on stopped
jobs to operating on running jobs.  I would not add this to bash.

Chet

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/