[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well)
From: |
Jonathan Nieder |
Subject: |
Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well) |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:12:41 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi,
Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech wrote:
> I see this problem in the latest Bash 4.2 as well. Say, I invoke
> "rbash" or "bash -r". This leaves me in a restrictive shell.
> However, this restrictive shell allows me to run "bash" or any other
> shell (without execing - just simply run) which leaves me in a
> normal shell.
Typically rbash is used with a nonstandard PATH setting to give users
access to a restricted set of commands.
However, I notice that the bash(1) manpage does not mention anything
about that. If you can come up with a way to hint at it without
making the manpage much longer (maybe by tweaking the sentence that
starts "A restricted shell is used to set up an environment"), I
imagine that would be helpful.
Thanks and hope that helps,
Jonathan
- Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech, 2012/01/11
- Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well),
Jonathan Nieder <=
- Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Chet Ramey, 2012/01/11
- RE: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech, 2012/01/11
- Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Jonathan Nieder, 2012/01/11
- RE: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech, 2012/01/12
- Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Pierre Gaston, 2012/01/12
- RE: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech, 2012/01/12
- Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Pierre Gaston, 2012/01/12
- RE: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well), Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech, 2012/01/12