[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well)

From: Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech
Subject: RE: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:02:26 +0530

Thanks for the education!

I am planning a workaround. If I hit success, I will write again - hoping you 
guys won't mind...

-----Original Message-----
From: Pierre Gaston [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 4:30 PM
To: Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech
Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
Subject: Re: Restricted Bash - Not so restrictive (in 4.2 as well)

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Sarnath K - ERS, HCLTech
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Oops.. It actually works! That's a great catch!
> I thought "redirection" is not supported in restricted mode though..!
> I just checked... It is mostly related to "output" re-direction.
> Hmm......I think I am going to tinker "bash" source code to disable the 
> "echo" builtin. :-)
> Any ideas?
I don 't think it's a good idea, there are many many many tricks like
this ( printf, read, mapfile....), or for instance just run:
and you will get the file as an error message.

As hinted at the beginning securing a shell like you want should
probably be discussed elsewhere, maybe on a debian list.


The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only.
It shall not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. 
Any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the 
opinions of HCL or its affiliates.
Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, 
distribution and / or publication of
this message without the prior written consent of the author of this e-mail is 
strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender 
immediately. Before opening any mail and
attachments please check them for viruses and defect.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]