[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0)
From: |
Pierre Gaston |
Subject: |
Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0) |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:16:33 +0200 |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Linda Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> wrote:
>
>
> DJ Mills wrote:
>
>>> OK. �How about if that sentence began with `When specifying n, the
>>> digits greater ...'?
>>
>>
>> declare -i foo; foo=20#a2; echo "$foo"
>> 202
>>
>> [base#]n, 'base' is a INTEGER 2-64, then '#', followed by the number.
>
>
>
> ^^^ That's much more clear!
But then one could think that the integer 0xa is a valid base which is
not the case since it's not a decimal number
- bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), Linda Walsh, 2012/01/28
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), Andreas Schwab, 2012/01/28
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), Linda Walsh, 2012/01/29
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), Andreas Schwab, 2012/01/29
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), Roger, 2012/01/29
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), Chet Ramey, 2012/01/29
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), DJ Mills, 2012/01/30
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), Linda Walsh, 2012/01/30
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0),
Pierre Gaston <=
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), Chet Ramey, 2012/01/30
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), DJ Mills, 2012/01/30
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), Chet Ramey, 2012/01/30
- Re: bash man page needs more examples...(i.e. >0), Linda Walsh, 2012/01/30