[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [patch] fix building when readline is disabled

From: Chet Ramey
Subject: Re: [patch] fix building when readline is disabled
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:49:57 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1

Hash: SHA1

On 4/24/12 10:46 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 April 2012 08:23:04 Chet Ramey wrote:
>> On 4/24/12 12:00 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>> OK, so you've stripped the local readline copy out of the source tree?
>>> yes
>>>> Then configured it to build with a system readline library installation
>>>> that you remove?
>>> the system doesn't have readline at all
>> Why?
> because it's a small system which has no need for things like readline.  i 
> don't think this is a terribly unusual use case.

Sure, there are systems that don't want or need the readline library
installed or things linked to it.  That's not unusual.  It's not what
we're talking about here.

What we're talking about is removing about 1 MB of source code
(lib/readline) from the bash source tree *wherever you're building it*.
This doesn't have anything to do with readline being built or installed.
I don't have any doubt that you encountered a build error when you removed
lib/readline from the bash source tree.  What I'm wondering is what you
thought you would gain by doing it.

- -- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    address@hidden    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]