bug-bash
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question about the return value of 'local'


From: Chet Ramey
Subject: Re: Question about the return value of 'local'
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:33:01 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0

On 12/14/12 2:37 AM, Francis Moreau wrote:

>> `help' is a quick reference -- a handy shortcut.  The authoritative
>> documentation is still the manual page and texinfo document.
> 
> Then maybe an option should be added to 'local' to display the full
> description that one can get from the manual, or maybe change the
> behaviour of '-m' switch ?

It was never a goal to duplicate the entire 70+-page manual inside bash.
Why would I add options to each builtin to do that?

The -m option to help was intended to display in a more familiar format.
It's not a manual replacement, either.

We already have the man page and the info file.


-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    address@hidden    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]