[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should this be this way?
|
From: |
Linda Walsh |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should this be this way? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:27:23 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
DJ Mills wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Linda Walsh <bash@tlinx.org
> <mailto:bash@tlinx.org>> wrote:
>
> You didn't answer the question... how did you call the script?
>
> ''sh script'' ?
---
I typed the script name interactively on the command line -- the way
I thought most people ran scripts.
I mentioned that everything in my ENV and usage pointed at /bin/bash.
Why would I do that, and then use 'sh script'?
Wouldn't that sorta be deliberately misleading?
- Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/25
- Re: Should this be this way?, DJ Mills, 2013/02/25
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/25
- Re: Should this be this way?, DJ Mills, 2013/02/25
- Re: Should this be this way?,
Linda Walsh <=
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chris Down, 2013/02/25
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chet Ramey, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Greg Wooledge, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Greg Wooledge, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/27
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chris Down, 2013/02/27
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chet Ramey, 2013/02/28