[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should this be this way?
From: |
Pierre Gaston |
Subject: |
Re: Should this be this way? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:36:00 +0200 |
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> writes:
>
>> I say that somewhat tongue-in-cheek myself. Because sourcing files
>> removes the abstraction barriers of a stacked child process and
>> actions there can persistently change the current shell. Not good as
>> a general interface for random actions. Normal scripts are better.
>
> You can still put the sourcing in a subshell if you don't want
> persistent changes.
ehe, or just "bash script"
- Re: Should this be this way?, (continued)
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chet Ramey, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Greg Wooledge, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Greg Wooledge, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/27
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chris Down, 2013/02/27
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chet Ramey, 2013/02/28
- Re: Should this be this way?, Bob Proulx, 2013/02/28
- Re: Should this be this way?, Andreas Schwab, 2013/02/28
- Re: Should this be this way?,
Pierre Gaston <=
- Re: Should this be this way?, Sven Mascheck, 2013/02/28
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/28
- Re: Should this be this way?, Chet Ramey, 2013/02/26
- Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/02/27
Re: Should this be this way?, Pierre Gaston, 2013/02/26
Re: Should this be this way?, Roman Rakus, 2013/02/26