[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Obsolete SIGRTMAX-n signal names

From: Chet Ramey
Subject: Re: Obsolete SIGRTMAX-n signal names
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:26:00 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4

On 4/23/13 2:05 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> As reported in http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?8025 , I would like to see the
> SIGRTMAX-n signal names disappear.
> Signals should never ever be addressed with SIGRTMAX-n. Signals should always 
> be
> addressed with SIGRTMIN+n.

I'll take a look at this, but that's a pretty strong statement to make from
something that appears in one Linux man page.  I can't find any shell in my
quick testing that behaves as you propose.  Is there any other reason to do


``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    address@hidden    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]