[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFE: capture command AND output for display and/or redirection
From: |
todd . dsm |
Subject: |
Re: RFE: capture command AND output for display and/or redirection |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:01:33 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:41:04 PM UTC-5, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/23/2013 01:07 PM, todd.dsm@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Guys, I found the part in the manual about submitting bugs but not requests
> > for enhancement. If this is not the right place, let me know.
>
>
>
> A missing feature is merely a different form of bug, so yes, this is the
>
> right place.
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Enhancement Request:
>
> > Bash could use a standardized method of capturing a command AND its output
> > for display in the terminal and/or redirection (to wherever, file, what
> > have you).
>
>
>
> 'set -x' is standardized by POSIX, and portable to more than just bash.
>
> Additionally, the DEBUG trap can provide you bash-specific additional
>
> hooks into logging, at the expense of no longer being standardized.
>
>
>
> >
>
> > Is this silly = yes. But, I have 2 words to disable any similar arguments:
> > 'government work'. The white collars may never come around to our way of
> > thinking, or more appropriately, knowing. Until that happens some goofy
> > reporting must be used.
>
> >
>
> > echoing a command, then executing is just duplication; also silly. trap is
> > cool, (EG: trap 'printf %s\\n "$BASH_COMMAND" >&2' DEBUG) - but in the case
> > of redirection to a file, the variable is first printed literally, then
> > expanded; this fails too.
>
> >
>
> > Is there any any relief for those working-class scripters like myself?
>
>
>
> Yes, and what you want already exists.
>
>
>
> Read this thread for more details:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-bash/2013-04/msg00031.html
>
>
>
> In particular, that thread points out:
>
> http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashFAQ/050
>
>
>
> --
>
> Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
>
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Omitting the set -x from the original post was my error:
1) I wouldn't live without it for debugging purposes.
2) set x- creates a lot of "noise" on the screen the suites cannot live with.
Is there no foundation for this request to make our lives bit more comfortable?