[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited
|
From: |
Gerard Seibert |
|
Subject: |
Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited |
|
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:48:18 -0400 |
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:19:44 -0400
Greg Wooledge articulated:
> Yes it can. You're talking about adding a ridiculous amount of extra
> checking and performance penalty to try to avoid users shooting
> themselves in the foot *on Unix*.
The job of the OS is not to prevent a user from shooting themselves in
the foot, but rather to deliver the bullet as efficiently as possible.
--
Gerard ✌
gerard@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__________________________________________________________________
- don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, jidanni, 2013/06/07
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Pierre Gaston, 2013/06/07
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, jidanni, 2013/06/07
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, jidanni, 2013/06/07
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Chet Ramey, 2013/06/07
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, jidanni, 2013/06/07
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/09
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Mike Frysinger, 2013/06/10
- Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/10