Re: don't just seek to the next line if the script has been edited

[jidanni]

>>>>> "GW" == Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> writes:
GW> You're talking about adding a ridiculous amount of extra checking
GW> and performance penalty to try to avoid users shooting themselves in
GW> the foot *on Unix*.

I dunno... I thought it might be just reading a couple bytes from where
the date is stored before reading a lot more bytes from where the data
is stored. But what do I know.