[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash
From: |
Pierre Gaston |
Subject: |
Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:24:41 +0300 |
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Linda Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> wrote:
> I was wondering if I was missing some syntax somewhere...
> but I wanted to be able to pass the name of a hash in
> and store stuff in it and later retrieve it... but it
> looks like it's only possible with an eval or such?
>
> Would be nice....(??)*sigh*
>
bash4 has associative arrays:
declare -A array
array[foobar]=baz
echo "${array[foobar]}"
- currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/09
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash,
Pierre Gaston <=
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/10
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chet Ramey, 2013/06/10
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/13
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chris Down, 2013/06/14
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/14
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Chris Down, 2013/06/14
- Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/14
Re: currently doable? Indirect notation used w/a hash, Greg Wooledge, 2013/06/10