[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules f
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8 |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:16:12 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 6/28/13 1:04 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
>
> Chet Ramey wrote:
>> The world is larger than glibc and the glibc locale definitions. We need
>> a solution that encompasses all of it. That solution should, and maybe
>> will, include glibc, but that is not sufficient by itself.
> ----
> I don't suppose it is possible to use the Unicode
> collation order when using unicode?
This is specified in the locale definition file.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, (continued)
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 2013/06/27
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US -- why is a<A<b<B<y<Y<z<Z?, Chet Ramey, 2013/06/27
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/28
- Re: locale specific ordering in EN_US vs. characterset collation rules for UTF-8,
Chet Ramey <=