[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in function return statement in while subshell
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in function return statement in while subshell |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:44:53 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 06:36:58PM +0300, Pierre Gaston wrote:
> it's not clear (like it is for, say, exit) what the relationship
> between return and process is.
> I guess most people expect it to not care about subshells and just
> execute the statement after the function call.
"Most people" barely know what a subshell is.
> I'm not sure how the case foo () { return & echo foo; } would fit though.
My personal opinion is that this is horrible code and you should be
ashamed of it, if you wrote it. The return is executed in a background
job, so it does nothing except cause immediate termination of the job.
I don't see any compelling argument to change the way Bash handles this.
- Bug in function return statement in while subshell, Roman Rakus, 2013/07/29
- Re: Bug in function return statement in while subshell, Roman Rakus, 2013/07/29
- Re: Bug in function return statement in while subshell, Pierre Gaston, 2013/07/30
- Re: Bug in function return statement in while subshell, Chris Down, 2013/07/30
- Re: Bug in function return statement in while subshell, Pierre Gaston, 2013/07/30
- Re: Bug in function return statement in while subshell, Chris Down, 2013/07/30
- Re: Bug in function return statement in while subshell, Pierre Gaston, 2013/07/30
- Re: Bug in function return statement in while subshell, Chris Down, 2013/07/30
- Re: Bug in function return statement in while subshell, Greg Wooledge, 2013/07/30