[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bash-4.3 bug report
From: |
Dave Rutherford |
Subject: |
Re: bash-4.3 bug report |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:51:55 -0400 |
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:22 PM, David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone experienced looking at the code will always need to examine it
> more closely to find out why it's a good idea in this case to use an array
> index and *then* sanity check it's value.
But in this case it's a limiting check, not a bounds check,
and having it second helps to make this clear. I agree that
the bug lies in the static analyzer.
- bash-4.3 bug report, David Binderman, 2014/04/14
- Re: bash-4.3 bug report, Chet Ramey, 2014/04/14
- Re: bash-4.3 bug report, Eric Blake, 2014/04/14
- Re: bash-4.3 bug report, Andreas Schwab, 2014/04/14
- Re: bash-4.3 bug report, Eric Blake, 2014/04/14
- Re: bash-4.3 bug report, Andreas Schwab, 2014/04/14
- Re: bash-4.3 bug report, Eric Blake, 2014/04/14
- RE: bash-4.3 bug report, David Binderman, 2014/04/14
- Re: bash-4.3 bug report, Eric Blake, 2014/04/14
- Re: bash-4.3 bug report,
Dave Rutherford <=
- Re: bash-4.3 bug report, Dennis Williamson, 2014/04/14
- Re: bash-4.3 bug report, Chet Ramey, 2014/04/14