[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: array subscripts act differently for integers(ie. let)
From: |
Eduardo A . Bustamante López |
Subject: |
Re: array subscripts act differently for integers(ie. let) |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:58:47 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 03:04:49AM +0100, emanuelczirai@cryptolab.net wrote:
> Description:
> when dealing with integer operations(let, ++), "bad array subscript"
> errors
> can happen because subscripts get unquoted (and evaluated even though they
> are in single quotes); unlike what happens when dealing with strings.
Not a bug. That's just how bash works.
- Re: array subscripts act differently for integers(ie. let), (continued)
- Re: array subscripts act differently for integers(ie. let), emanuelczirai, 2015/02/18
- Re: array subscripts act differently for integers(ie. let), Eduardo A . Bustamante López, 2015/02/18
- Re: array subscripts act differently for integers(ie. let), Dan Douglas, 2015/02/18
- Re: array subscripts act differently for integers(ie. let), Chet Ramey, 2015/02/19
- Re: array subscripts act differently for integers(ie. let), Chet Ramey, 2015/02/19
- Re: array subscripts act differently for integers(ie. let), Dan Douglas, 2015/02/20
- Re: array subscripts act differently for integers(ie. let), Chet Ramey, 2015/02/21
Re: array subscripts act differently for integers(ie. let),
Eduardo A . Bustamante López <=