[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Usage of __P vs PARAMS in histfile.c

From: Mike Frysinger
Subject: Re: Usage of __P vs PARAMS in histfile.c
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 20:47:25 -0400

On 08 Apr 2015 14:13, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 4/8/15 11:25 AM, Evan Gates wrote:
> > I tried compiling bash with musl-gcc and failed due to the __P macros
> > in histfile.c
> > 
> > While digging around it appears that __P is defined in stdc.h, but
> > histfile.c indirectly includes rlstdc.h istead. rlstdc.h defines an
> > identical macro with the name PARAMS instead of __P
> Yes, you're right.  Readline source files need to use PARAMS; bash source
> files use __P (history -- don't ask).

do you still support such old systems that require this pre-ANSI prototypes ?  
pretty much all other GNU projects have dropped support for them.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]