Re: aliases v. functions; command extension? (-f & -F)?

[Chet Ramey]

On 1/9/16 5:06 PM, Piotr Grzybowski wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Reuti <reuti@staff.uni-marburg.de> wrote:
>>
>> AFAICS putting the name in quotes (single or double) will prefer the 
>> function over the alias, but it will fall back to a command if there is no 
>> function.
>>
>> 'P' params
> 
>  if Linda is ok with it, I will not argue, I would prefer an explicit
> way to call what I want.

You already know the invocation order, and there are several ways to alter
it.  The whole reason `command' exists, for instance, is to skip the shell
function part of the command search.

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/