[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in [ -f file ] test
From: |
Siteshwar Vashisht |
Subject: |
Re: bug in [ -f file ] test |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jul 2016 03:28:52 -0400 (EDT) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: "László Házy" <hazy_l@yahoo.com>
> To: "Greg Wooledge" <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
> Cc: bug-bash@gnu.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 2:18:55 AM
> Subject: Re: bug in [ -f file ] test
>
> I had disabled SELinux, and got the same results. So it is not SELinux.
How did you turn off SELinux ? Was it turned off before bash started ? I would
suggest you to boot with selinux=0 kernel parameter and check if this issue
reproduces.
I had investigated similar bug couple of months back where MLS policies were
affecting behavior of file permission checks. You can read the bug report
here[1]. faccessat() function in glibc does not correctly emulate AT_EACCESS
and AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flags and there is a bug[2] filed against glibc to fix
this behavior. While the issue I investigated was specific to root user, it's
possible it might be affecting non-root users too.
> I am afraid Chet did not set the permissions to /home/user1 as per the
> command list I had given. As I said before, it does not affect cd, ls
> nor cat on my system since /home/user1 and file have the required
> permissions for the group.
>
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329691#c0
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333764
--
--
Siteshwar Vashisht
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, (continued)
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, Reuti, 2016/07/27
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, László Házy, 2016/07/27
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, Reuti, 2016/07/27
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, László Házy, 2016/07/27
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, Reuti, 2016/07/27
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, László Házy, 2016/07/27
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, Chet Ramey, 2016/07/27
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, László Házy, 2016/07/27
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, Greg Wooledge, 2016/07/27
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, László Házy, 2016/07/27
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test,
Siteshwar Vashisht <=
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, László Házy, 2016/07/28
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, Chet Ramey, 2016/07/27
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, László Házy, 2016/07/28
- Message not available
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, László Házy, 2016/07/28
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, Piotr Grzybowski, 2016/07/28
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, Chet Ramey, 2016/07/28
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, Chet Ramey, 2016/07/28
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, Charles Daffern, 2016/07/28
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, Piotr Grzybowski, 2016/07/28
- Re: bug in [ -f file ] test, László Házy, 2016/07/28