[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: extension of file-test primitives?

From: Chet Ramey
Subject: Re: extension of file-test primitives?
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:09:56 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 8/20/17 5:20 PM, L A Walsh wrote:
> PePa wrote:
>> In that case, would not [[ =fx $file ]] be more workable and in line with
>> common GNU short commandline option practice??
> Do you mean '-fx' ?  I assume you are meaning as an alternate?

No. If you're going to propose different functionality, don't use
something that can easily be confused with something that already

``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    address@hidden    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]