[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: extension of file-test primitives?
From: |
Pierre Gaston |
Subject: |
Re: extension of file-test primitives? |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Aug 2017 16:22:09 +0300 |
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:55 PM, L A Walsh <bash@tlinx.org> wrote:
>
>
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> They're not intended to work that way. If you want to test f+x+s then
>> you just make another function:
>>
>> -fxs() { test -f "$1" && test -x "$1" && test -s "$1"; }
>>
>>
> How many different single-ops? over 20? That's 20 factorial
> combos. You wanna include that in a script? um...
>
You can use a loop, here is hack(ish) function that perhaps work (ie not
tested too much)
testfile () {
local OPTIND=1 f=${!#}
while getopts abcdefghLkprsSuwxOGN opt;
do
case $opt in
[abcdefghLkprsSuwxOGN]) test -$opt $f || return 1;;
*)return 1;;
esac;
done
}
if testfile -fx file;then.
Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Chet Ramey, 2017/08/21
Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Greg Wooledge, 2017/08/21
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Chet Ramey, 2017/08/21
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, L A Walsh, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Greg Wooledge, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, L A Walsh, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?,
Pierre Gaston <=
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Greg Wooledge, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Chet Ramey, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Dethrophes, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Chet Ramey, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Dethrophes, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Chet Ramey, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, dethrophes, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Chet Ramey, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, dethrophes, 2017/08/23
- Re: extension of file-test primitives?, Chet Ramey, 2017/08/23